CMS Analysis Summary : https:\/\/cds.cern.ch\/record\/2784590?ln=en<\/a><\/p>\n If you’ve met a particle physicist in the past decade, they’ve almost certainly told you about the Higgs boson<\/a>. Since its discovery in 2012, physicists have been busy measuring as many of its properties as the ATLAS and CMS datasets will allow, including its couplings to other particles (e.g. bottom quarks or muons) and how it gets produced at the LHC. Any deviations from the standard model (SM) predictions might signal new physics, so people are understandably very eager to learn as much as possible about the Higgs.<\/p>\n Amidst all the talk of Yukawa couplings and decay modes, it might occur to you to ask a seemingly simpler question: what is the Higgs boson’s lifetime? This turns out to be very difficult to measure, and it was only recently — nearly 10 years after the Higgs discovery — that the CMS experiment released the first measurement<\/a> of its lifetime.<\/p>\n The difficulty lies in the Higgs’ extremely short lifetime, predicted by the standard model to be around 10\u207b\u00b2\u00b2 seconds. This is far shorter than anything we could hope to measure directly, so physicists instead measured a related quantity: its width<\/strong>. According to the Heiseinberg uncertainty principle, short-lived particles can have significant uncertainty in their energy. This means that whenever we produce a Higgs boson at the LHC and reconstruct its mass from its decay products, we’ll measure a slightly different mass each time. If you make a histogram of these measurements, its shape looks like a Breit-Wigner<\/em> distribution (Fig. 1) peaked at the nominal mass and with a characteristic width .<\/p>\n So, the measurement should be easy, right? Just measure a bunch of Higgs decays, make a histogram of the mass, and run a fit! Unfortunately, things don’t work out this way. A particle’s width and lifetime are inversely proportional, meaning an extremely short-lived particle will have a large width and vice-versa. For particles like the Z boson — which lives for about 10\u207b\u00b2\u2075 seconds — we can<\/em> simply extract its width from its mass spectrum. The Higgs, however, sits in a sweet spot of experimental evasion: its lifetime is too short to measure, and the corresponding width (about 4 MeV) cannot be resolved by our detectors, whose resolution is limited to roughly 1 GeV.<\/p>\n To overcome this difficulty, physicists relied on another quantum mechanical quirk: “off-shell” Higgs production. Most of the time, a Higgs is produced on-shell<\/em>, meaning its reconstructed mass will be close to the Breit-Wigner peak. In rare cases, however, it can be produced with a mass very far away from its nominal mass (off-shell<\/em>) and undergo decays that are otherwise energetically forbidden. Off-shell production is incredibly rare, but if you can manage to measure the ratio of off-shell to on-shell production rates, you can deduce the Higgs width!<\/p>\n Have we just replaced one problem (a too-short lifetime) with another one (rare off-shell production)? Thankfully, the Breit-Wigner distribution saves the day once again. The CMS analysis focused on a Higgs decaying to a pair of Z bosons (Fig. 2, left), one of which must be produced off-shell (the Higgs mass is 125 GeV, whereas each Z is 91 GeV). The Z bosons have a Breit-Wigner peak of their own, however, which enhances the production rate of very<\/em> off-shell Higgs bosons that can decay to a pair of on-shell<\/em> Zs. The enhancement means that roughly 10% of H \u2192 ZZ decays are expected to involve an off-shell Higgs, which is a large enough fraction to measure with the present-day CMS dataset!<\/p>\n To measure the off-shell H \u2192 ZZ rate, physicists looked at events where one Z boson decays to a pair of leptons and the other to a pair of neutrinos. The neutrinos escape the detector without depositing any energy, generating a large missing transverse momentum<\/a> which helps identify candidate Higgs events. Using the missing momentum as a proxy for the neutrinos’ momentum, they reconstruct a “transverse mass” for the off-shell Higgs boson. By comparing the observed transverse mass spectrum to the expected “continuum background” (Z boson pairs produced via other mechanisms, e.g. Fig. 2, right) and signal rate, they are able to extract the off-shell production rate.<\/p>\n After a heavy load of sophisticated statistical analysis, the authors found that off-shell Higgs production happened at a rate consistent with SM predictions (Fig. 3). Using these off-shell events, they measured the Higgs width to be 3.2 (+2.4, -1.7) MeV, again consistent with the expectation of 4.1 MeV and a marked improvement upon the previously measured limit of 9.2 MeV.<\/p>\n Unfortunately, this result doesn’t hint at any new physics in the Higgs sector. It does, however, mark a significant step forward into the era of precision Higgs physics at ATLAS and CMS. With a mountain of data at our fingertips — and much more data to come in the next decade — we’ll soon find out what else the Higgs has to teach us.<\/p>\n “Life of the Higgs Boson”<\/a> – Coverage of this result from the CMS Collaboration<\/p>\n “Most Particles Decay \u2014 But Why?”<\/a> – An interesting article by Matt Strassler explaining why (some) particles decay<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.particlebites.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/breit_wigner-300x192.png\")
<\/a>![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.particlebites.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/HZZ_diagram-300x116.png\")
<\/a>![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.particlebites.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/sig_strength-2-251x300.jpg\")
<\/a>Read More<\/h1>\n